Yediot Aharonot: Washington has lost its deterrent force towards Iran

In parallel with the seventh round of negotiations on the nuclear agreement in the Austrian capital Vienna, which is attended by the American delegation from a nearby hotel to the place of negotiations, in response to the desire of Iran that refuses to sit with it at the same table, the voices rejecting this agreement from the occupation entity are above the ones that are considered the statesThe United has lost its deterrent force towards Iran and that this agreement will not affect the delay of the Tehran nuclear program, especially after the Prime Minister of the occupation failed to persuade President Joe Biden to go towards the military option and not to return to the agreement.

Yediot Aharonot indicated in an article that "the fact of the Biden administration wants to agree, and that the Iranians play it as if they are difficult to reach, evidence of the weakness of the United States and its loss of the ability to deter it." It also saw that "the fact that the Greater America needs notification from the Israeli intelligence in order to give its soldiers fromA base in Syria for fear of the Iranian marches that it bombed last month or that despite its knowledge of Iran's standing behind the dangerous attack without doing anything, it is another evidence of the sunset of the United States..Translated text:

On the negotiating table in Vienna much more than the future of the Iranian nuclear project, most of the participants realize that if the agreement occur.Diplomacy between the lines will be clear this week, and behind the smiles, broad and more fundamental facts will emerge from relations between Iran and the United States and the United States and "Israel", and on the priorities of the Biden administration and the American future in the Middle East, and mainly, the continued position of the United States the central international playerAnd his ability to keep the strength of his deterrence.

Returning to negotiations is part of the conflict between the supporters of the falconer in the Trump and Netanyahu administration, who believe that the apostasy of the Aqdal player like Iran can only be by force, including secret operations, aggressive and sanctions, and between those who adopt a diplomatic approach in the Obama and Biden administrations, whoThey believe that power will only lead to more power, and Iran will not submit.According to this approach, the only way, in practice, is the path of dialogue, the middle solutions and agreements, and thus it will be possible to stop the Iranian race to the bomb, and even take it, just as the former Foreign Minister John Kerry hopes, returning to the bosom of the peoples of the peoples.

Whoever reads the beginning of the document entitled "Central Goals of" Centcom ", the leadership of the American central region, will ask: Why does the United States come to Vienna? The document broadcasts design and hardening and clearly determines that the primary goal of the 300,000 American soldiers led by the central region is"Iran's deterrence, "the Iranian regime" puts stability and causes an escalation "in the region.In other words: the leadership of the American central region is preparing for war with Iran.

Two years ago, the commander of the region was the great General Frank McNezi, among those who influenced President Trump to assassinate Qassem Soleimani, the great Iranian operational man.Immediately after that, McKinsey recommended that Israel lead to the leadership of the central region. A step that gave its fruits last January.About a month ago, the permanent representative of the Israeli army also arrived at the leadership.In order to bridle Iran, the Obama administration promised "Israel" that the Central region's leadership would attack Iran if all efforts fail.Indeed, the Minister of Defense presented to his counterpart at the time, Ehud Barak, a dazzling documentation of the video of supernatural shells that were developed specifically against Iran, to destroy the tunnels that were dug in the mountains in the desert of Nafada, photographing a simulation of Iranian facilities.In 2015, the United States signed the nuclear agreement, because its leaders believed that it can excuse them from this attack.He had virtues: He completely dismantled the waters of the heavy reactor in Arak, practically closed the Iranian effort to produce a Plutonium bomb, and led to the dismantling of large parts of Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the material at its disposal.In other words: froze the nuclear project and obligate Iran with permanent supervision.

But it was also full of holes: a limited period in which Iran is committed to agreement;And the mechanism of control was clear from the beginning that it would be difficult to enforce;And the lack of destruction, but only to dismantle part of the equipment;Iran's lack of commitment to stop scientific development.The great powers accepted the Iranian claim that they did not try to develop a nuclear bomb, not to mention the failure to stop the missile project and without any word about its support for terrorism.

Historical developments have proven since signing the opposite agreement: Iran has implemented the agreement until 2018, to this limit, and dismantled what it promised to dismantle it, and accumulated up to 300 kilograms of enriched uranium in a low degree..In 2018 Mossad stole the nuclear archive, "We knew that they were lying and had a military project in the past," John Kerry will later say, "But we knew that they would not recognize this, and if we insisted, we would not have agreed.".

As for Netanyahu, he thought differently and used archive documents to persuade Trump to withdraw from the agreement.The withdrawal led to a partial Iranian withdrawal and moved to the nuclear project at a reinforced pace: more fertilization, more advanced centrifugal devices, and more radioactive material.

The supporters of the "new" agreement claim: the old agreement proved that it stopped Iran's road to the bomb, and Trump's action - with the encouragement of "Israel exactly" - the opposite, Iran today is in a developed situation more than it was on the day of withdrawal.By claiming opponents of the agreement: Iran has succeeded in moving and erecting modern centrifugal devices, which proves that all agreement is based only on the basis of the good intention of the Ayatollah regime, and not to impose its ability to advance towards the weapon of the Day of Judgment.In the sense that the agreement is not equal to the paper that signed it.

The fact that the Biden administration wants to agree, and that the Iranians play it as if they are difficult to obtain, evidence of the weakness and loss of the United States..The fact that the Greater America needs a notification from the Israeli intelligence in order to give its soldiers from a base in Syria for fear of the Iranian marches that it bombed last month or that despite its knowledge of Iran's standing behind the dangerous attack without doing anything, it is another evidence of the sunset of the United States star.

But the agreement, as much as it relates to the United States and Europe, is a final topic: the remaining embarrassing question: Will Iran be required to return to the point where it was on the eve of the previous agreement, or will talk about "freezing the status quo", in which it expresses the achievements of its development since the withdrawal?As for European countries, strangely, they are the one that takes a more stiff approach to Iran.

The fate of sanctions on the agenda: the sanctions and restrictions imposed on Iran over decades have caused great harm to the regime and the state.The embarrassing question is: Will you raise, and how much and how much will the administration insist on imposing it?The impression of "Israel" is that it is not written in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is that it is not left to express an extra motivation on the issue of sanctions..And appreciation is that history is repeated: everyone who has the subject of the nuclear agreement in "Israel" and the United States in 2015 has returned to treat it now.All of them rose: Biden became president, Barnes as president.Which.Whichه، وبلينكن وزيراً للخارجية، وكوهن أصبح رئيس الموساد.As for the replacement of Bennett instead of Netanyahu, it violated this image, but it did not in reality change anything in the Israeli opposition. فور قيام إدارة بWhichدن، أعلنت بأنها تريد العودة إلى الاتفاق.This is a source of a desire to delete Trump's heritage. في نظر الكثيرين في الإدارة الحالية: كل ما فعلته "إسرائيل" في تلك الفترة بالتعاون مع الولWhichات المتحدة مصاب بـ "سم" ترامب، وعليه فينبغي التخلص منه.It is this thought, and it is even more than every agreement with Iran, who should worry Israel.