Ways to succeed in the baccalaureate and doctorate.. Secrets and tips of gold

A number of experienced professors and some successful students agreed earlier that success in the doctoral competition, baccalaureate exams, or other scientific competitions requires the availability of conditions and controls that combine academic achievement, smart review, and systematic control, which often makes the difference during The correction process, which, according to them, requires taking into account such aspects in order to pass such competitions successfully. If the academic atmosphere knows a lot of disturbances due to the Corona epidemic, which has confused many accounts since the year 2020, not to mention some self-inhibitions and others resulting from the enemies of success for various reasons and circumstances, However, this does not prevent most serious and diligent students from revealing their aspirations to achieve outstanding successes in crucial scientific exams and competitions, foremost of which is the baccalaureate degree competition, which reveals every year models that combine competence and desire to study specializations that are in line with their future aspirations, and the same applies to students. Undergraduates with a master's degree, who wish to rise to the ranks of researchers through the portal of doctoral competitions. On this basis, we preferred to take the opinions of several professors and researchers who did not hesitate to provide directives and instructions that are important keys and secrets that help students to take the reasons to achieve success, by avoiding pressure, smart reading, and qualitative preparation from the cognitive, methodological and psychological aspects.

Professor Al-Tayeb Bouderbala The students should be in-depth, focused and not confused

Sorbonne University graduate Professor Tayeb Bouderbala says: “Preparation for the doctoral competition requires strict objective conditions in form and content, as it requires self-confidence, focus and not confusion. Give up reviewing lessons on the night of the exam and relax a bit. Great importance should also be given to font (clarity, readability and aesthetics). Deepening in the specialization, in its parts and faculties. Think deeply about the intent of the question before starting to answer (knowing the real intention of the questioner). Accordingly, the revision of the lessons leads to a comprehensive and holistic awareness of the subject (because the exam is based on the student's ability to comprehend and achieve total awareness of the comprehensive issues of substance). Methodology has a fundamental role, the need to show skill in description, analysis, discussion, gradation, conclusion, culmination, and the transition from the simple to the complex and from the known to the unknown (as well as the need to achieve coherence, interdependence, and unity that combines all the elements of the answer in a comprehensive organic framework. Evidence and representation must be used. Intent and economy And the rulings in the answer (no tedious redundancy or obscene brevity) and invest the entire exam time. In addition to giving great importance to the introduction to enter the world of the reader and draw him in, as well as to the conclusion that leaves the decisive impact, negatively or positively, on the psyche of the corrector.

Dr. Ammar Shushan from the Department of Psychology, University of Batna There are formal and objective aspects that have an effective role in success

Success is Sunnah and laws, and reasons must be taken into consideration. If we want to summarize them, they are the main and secondary reasons (formal and objective). As for the formalities, it means registering in the floor correctly, choosing the specialization and universities in a thoughtful manner, going to the exam before the specified time, checking the hall, the subject, the timing, etc., and adhering to the instructions, such as writing with one pen.. because many fail in these formal matters that prevent them from succeeding. As for the objective reasons, they are: diligence throughout the course of study, self-reliance in training, and a lot of reading books and articles in the specialty. Focusing on the subject of methodology, which is the basis of all competitions in all disciplines of humanities and social sciences.. as a reminder, the student studies it from his first year at the university to his final year in the master’s degree. He must also be well-arranged in his studies.. After he determines the specialization in which he will participate, and with the help of his professors and specialists, he chooses an original and comprehensive reference, which he tries to summarize and extract from it the most important ideas, and to develop a mental map for him that helps him to memorize and retrieve. He strives to obtain the questions of previous years’ competitions in order to have a picture of how the questions are formulated and strives to solve them. Success is the fruit of years of toil, patience, focus and good planning ahead of competitions

Dr. Yarub Jaradi, Department of Arabic Language, Constantine University, There is no magic formula.. Success is the culmination of the student's diligence throughout his course

There is no magic formula for success in the doctoral competition, but rather organized work and smart diligence, because this success is the culmination of the diligence exerted by the student throughout his university path in the bachelor’s and master’s levels. And he seeks to answer a question that he always attends to: How do these concepts change my view of the studied subject? And what did he add to the previous concepts? What is the novelty of this science approach? He is that student who returns to the most important references in each of the sciences that he has received, motivated by critical energy, and a non-stop verification of the validity and reliability of the knowledge that he received, transfers it all to schemes that root and branch, and stands on the joints of the subject, as well as evokes the great sayings of those scholars, and how they were established For a new doctrine, school, or curriculum, and how did it contradict and criticize the previous one, and how did it build another theory? As for the specialty of linguistics and the Arabic language, my advice is to distinguish well between the Arab heritage preoccupation with the language, and that major shift that was achieved in the era of the Arab renaissance, that era Which was distinguished by interaction with every new human in the field of language, and what are the founding revolutionary concepts on which modern linguistics built its edifice, and how this dose was a sign of passage from jurisprudence-linguistic knowledge to sciences based on permanent examination and periodic review, so that the field of Arabic linguistics emerges from some of theses Critical, some of which are beneficial, and some of them tried to reconcile the old and the new. I also advise him to return to the works of the founder of this lesson in Algeria, Dr. Abd al-Rahman al-Haj Saleh, and to the works of Abd al-Salam al-Masdi, Tamam Hassan, al-Fasi al-Fihri, and Munther al-Ayashi, and in the deliberations of the works of Imad Abdel Latif and Masoud Sahrawi , Muhammad Muhammad Yunus, and Muhammad al-Omari, and in all of this he is committed to accuracy in transmission, and abandons slogans that are often contradictory to the objective scientific spirit desired from him as a doctoral student in the future.

Professor Badr El Din Zawaqa from the Department of Information and Communication Sciences There are 4 basic jobs and levels that pave the way towards success

The student is faced with four levels of dealing with the accepted answer, which in the end are four functions: The retrieval function: It relates to retrieving all knowledge and information.. through writing ideas.. and writing them down, albeit in a random way.. and we advise the student to use the skill of brainstorming.. and reading The question several times.. to generate ideas stuck in the subconscious mind through knowledge and experiences. The methodological function: and it is by drawing a map of the answer from an introduction and a conclusion.. and they are often the last thing written.. then dismantling the ideas contained in the text of the question.. and understanding the theoretical approaches and systems Knowledge.. and choosing the appropriate one through its concepts, questions and hypotheses. Then the body of the topic, which is according to a template... and arranging the information according to importance and objective sequence. So choosing the scientific method and the appropriate tool. The analytical function: It relates to the researcher’s ability to answer in a scientific and accurate language.. away from rhetorical constructive methods.. and the attempt to objectively link ideas and information and highlight the personality of the researcher through classification, description, analysis, commentary, and criticism. The psychological function: It is very important and related With psychological readiness, after relying on God and adhering to the etiquette of seeking knowledge from dhikr and reckoning.

Dr. Badis Lounis from the Department of Information and Communication Sciences, these are the most important secrets of success in the PhD competition

The student must rely on God, pray, and not rely on frustration. There is no doubt that the one who accumulated information over a period of 5 years or more will have only one task left, which is to reorganize this information. Likewise, revision does not require a multitude of references as much as it requires intelligence in choosing the most important and appropriate ones. The student must bear in mind that he is in the process of convincing the corrector that it is a researcher's project, and not just an ordinary student, and therefore the lesson is not in the abundance of information, but in how it is employed. Relying as much as possible on theories when presenting any point of view. Citing the sayings and opinions of thinkers while separating ideas and giving each idea a distinct space for it. Avoid verbosity, verbosity and repetition, because this will tire the corrector and give a bad impression about you, and may affect the extent of the corrector's interest in your paper. Avoid exaggerated linguistic display. The line should be clear and not repulsive. As for the answer, it will be in the form of an essay, which should be preceded by a well-balanced and clear-cut plan that shows the content of the paper. Of course, the introduction includes an introduction to the issue to be discussed, along with asking the questions to be answered. The conceptual topic should not be absent from the answer sheet. It follows the introduction directly and includes identifying and defining key concepts without elaboration. The answer to the questions is in the form of clear points and in simple language, and it may be in the form of investigations or in the form of elements, but it must be arranged in a logical order and not fabricate it. And make sure to come up with a clear conclusion.

Dr. Mabrouk Boutouqa, Department of AnthropologyThe student is required to use the time and prove his analytical and critical abilities

Under pressure of time, most students resort to studying and keeping papers in the standards in which they will be tested in the same way they studied for five years, i.e. in the bachelor’s and master’s stages, and here they make a fatal mistake, because the post-graduate or doctoral stage starting with the competition is radically different About the graduation stage, as the student is required to prove his worth not only through the knowledge he has, but also by proving his analytical and critical abilities in dealing with the topics of specialization, which is a talent that can only be obtained through careful reading of the main books in the specialization, so it is very important to include Preparation for the competition - which should start at least 6 months ago - reading a selection of books in the specialty, and preferably discussing them with peers and professors.

PhD student Azouz Berkani (Political Sciences, University of Algiers) Qualitative achievement contributes to success and excellence

I went through the PhD competition experience for the first time in my scientific career last year, and thank God it was crowned with success at the University of Algiers 3. Based on this experience, I would like to tell the students that there are two main factors for success. My knowledge is saturated with high-end concepts and ideas, and it paints a good picture of the student with the corrector. The cumulative scientific and knowledge is the product of the student’s march during the bachelor’s and master’s stages. I believe that the results of this increase will be harvested by the student during this competition. As for the second factor, which is choosing three or four topics for each university and the project in which the competition was opened, so that he can prepare for it well. Students must accustom themselves these days to writing with a pen to avoid spelling errors resulting from the reluctance to write in the age of technology and computers. The thing I affirm is that no matter how some try to attach luck to the PhD competition, some of which cannot be denied, it remains the culmination of the student’s path, especially those who have striven in academic and cognitive achievement and made strenuous efforts inside and outside the university.

PhD student Kamal Zitouni (succeeded in two competitions in Blida and Batna). www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/119385 .. Here, the student's ingenuity is evident in choosing appropriate articles according to specialization, for example in the issues of modern literature, we select the most prominent issues of modernity, poetry, transgression, prose poem and digital literature .. Then we focus on critical approaches and control in Its most prominent mechanisms so that we can apply it to the text that we are asked to study, we should not neglect the methodology of the answer that often depends on the article, so we control the elements of the introduction by disassembling the question and knowing the key words and formulating the problem, then we move to the presentation and analyze the topic from various aspects and here we evoke as much as possible from Evidence and arguments that flow into the topic, and we conclude a conclusion that is a logical result of what was presented in the presentation, and it contains an explicit answer to what was raised by the problem.

PhD student Mahfouz Zaouch (succeeded in two competitions in Khenchela and Blida) Methodology and scientific accuracy take precedence over quantitative knowledge

Ibn Al-Masila Mahfouz Zawish preferred to summarize his experience with advice on these points: 1- The strategy of choosing a specialization in terms of training and the competence of the student. 3.3- Dealing well with the question by searching for what is required and decoding the question’s codes and fragmenting it. 4- Not focusing on the amount of knowledge as much as scientific accuracy. 5- Well organizing the answer with a precise scheme according to the methodology of an arbitrary essay as if it were a brief graduation note. 6- Arbitrary preparation based on understanding Get used to analysis and persuasion.