Philosophy and the jurisprudence of reality

Philosophy continues to be presented in the educated international circles and elites as a problem that goes to deal with between saying the permanent need for it, no matter how growing the transformations witnessed by man and the world, and saying their demise and end in light of the tremendous sweeping caused by technical, scientific and informational developments.

If we look at the requirements of our current time and in front of these new situations and data, we will stand on the fact that philosophy has become absent to us as if it belongs to a past stage.It is of a theoretical nature that drowns in abstraction and generality, and its logic is not compatible with the problems of the times, and it has no concrete and direct results, and it is almost interrupted by the problems of life.

Certainly, philosophy is not easy to gain people's satisfaction, as it is in terms of being a theoretical practice, it is difficult for the minds that are not prepared for this color of thinking, until the aversion of it usually became accompanied by every philosophical text.Philosophy only understands the philosophy itself and does not realize its benefit except for those who have found it in its collection and the news of its methods and gained skill in reading and understanding it.

In our research, we aim to consider the contents of the philosophical mind and the importance of these contents in establishing correct rules for the process of answering the questions of knowledge and existence, by revealing its origins and explaining its topics, as we tried to reach a perception or a total vision that allows this type of knowledge to exceed the traditional view, And the possibility of developing and developing it intellectually and realistic, and there is no doubt that the mission of the philosophical mind is not independent of being an intellectual method and a cultural pattern, and thus remains its specificity that is reflected in its existential topics and cognitive problems, in terms of society’s vision of it in the reality system, and in terms of the nature of the philosophical questions itself, and this is the subject of We searched.

We also aim to understand and understand the major transformations globally and create recent concepts to contribute to philosophical culture and raise awareness of the nature of its general and important questions, and how the answers are diversified.

We have concluded that philosophy, in fact, is to think about all affairs of life in order to make a person happy and improve his public life.

We also concluded that philosophy may not be necessary and important knowledge if it cannot overcome its own roots, so that it has the ability to absorb its own topics and answer fateful questions.Also, this can only be continuing thanks to a critical vision that puts things, life and reality is the subject of meditation, question and containment.

After this, we reached the fact that contemporary science with all its developments was unable to achieve what it achieved, without using other cultural aspects, especially philosophy, whether in its deep, comprehensive, logical formula or existential subjects.

The research will include four investigations:

The first topic: the philosophical mind and the nature of knowledge.

The second topic: the tasks of philosophy and its contents.

The third topic: in the language of philosophy and the implications of its question.

The fourth topic: philosophy and the logic of reality.

And from God success

The first topic: the philosophical mind and the nature of knowledge.

Many people believe that philosophy is a specific intellectual curriculum that cannot be compromised with its craftsmanship, or that it is a very beautiful, delicate statue that cannot be entered into its components and components. It is the love of wisdom and the search for truth through logical thinking and realistic observation.

But this view has changed, and its impact differed on the function of philosophical thought from one era to another and from one society to another, in line with the requirements of life, and the topics of philosophy are among the most important issues in life (the soul, the world, existence).What matters to a person is the first one himself, his life and what is surrounding him.It was said: (It is not the greatest misery for a person to starve or thirst, but to be ignorant of why he is born and why he dies).

Although the subjects of philosophy are old, it remains in every age because of being authentic and fundamental, and it takes at every time a new appearance that is commensurate with the circumstances and developments.

We do not create new when we say that each era has its wisdom, and the wisdom of the first century in this third millennium as it began to appear to us now is to return again to man, ethics and politics, but depending on the multiplicity of perspectives as a new value.

Therefore, the horizon of philosophical consideration has expanded and seemed to try tireless attempts to understand and understand the major transformations and the implications of scientific research achievements at the global level and their effects on the conditions of the human situation, in order to reformulate and create recent concepts to contribute to culture and awareness of the values of new human wisdom.

And thinking about development based on man as a citizen with memory, history and values, not the competence of fine sciences or technology, but rather a preoccupation with philosophical thought mainly.The start of considering a person from where it is, is the basis for understanding what philosophical thought is and the need for it.The mind that the wisdom was made and managed, and took its place a thought that puts wisdom and develops it, criticizes it, volunteers it, its fragmentation, re -install it, fertilize it, its right, send it in a new dress.

Philosophy gives us the ability to continuously critical review of our works, our knowledge and convictions, and in this sense philosophy is of the utmost importance to consider the goals that rise to it, and it does not bear its purposes and benefits in the issues that deal In terms of understanding the capabilities, overcoming difficulties and developing various mental capabilities. The importance of philosophy does not seek its material, but rather in developing intellectual customs and mental queens related to the methods of analyzing and criticizing information and revealing its various relationships and levels of formation.

This explains that philosophy does not exceed educational materials only, but also exceeds themselves, as it ignites, boasts and flourishes by destroying its material, in order to stoke the attractiveness of thinking and sharpen the energy inherent in all mental capabilities, with multiple and highly different capabilities for the launch in any direction determined by the will.

Philosophy is still presented in the educated international circles and elites as a problem that the dealing with it between saying the permanent need for it, no matter how extensive the transformations witnessed by man and the world, and saying their demise and end in light of the tremendous sweeping caused by technical, scientific and informational developments.

So we say that when looking at the requirements of our current time and in front of these new conditions and data, we will stand on the fact that philosophy has become absent to us as if it really belongs to a stage that has been given.It is of a theoretical nature that drowns in abstraction and general;And its logic is not in line with the problems of the world today;It does not have any concrete and direct cost -effective, and is almost disconnected to daily life problems.

Certainly, philosophy is not easy to gain friendliness and consent of most people, as it is in terms of being a theoretical practice, it is difficult for the minds that are not prepared for this color of thinking, until the aversion of it usually became accompanied by every philosophical proposition.Philosophy only understands the philosophy itself and does not realize its usefulness and find it except for those who have become acquainted with it and the news of its methods and gained a skill in reading and understanding it by training the mind and preparing it to absorb and be patient with the request.

I do not say that philosophy is a difficult or impossible issue, but rather a matter of jurisdiction, and specialization means attention in a specific field, and it is here the philosophical field that can be defined without diving into sects, it is the heritage of philosophers from Plato to Derrida and Habermas.

We should point out that the general public insists on the requirements of the direct and tangible benefit, and that they are calling for any intellectual or practical activity to provide its justifications and benefit that remains, most people, of a sensual utilitarian nature.

We must recognize, in order to determine in a realistic way the benefit of philosophy, that its value lies in its connection with the needs and aspirationsScientific attention, such as ethics, values, spirit, freedom and general existence.

The continuity of mental and spiritual development is associated with the most associated with the mechanism of criticism.This is the most important characteristic, which is that philosophical thinking is critical thinking, and it tries the amount of effort to exceed its data to re -ask questions and bounce it to itself.

The critical characteristic of philosophical thinking suggests to us that perfection within any humanitarian system is only an illusion.

And the absence of criticism from human, social, political, cultural and intellectual thinking, weakens its eligibility and reduces its effectiveness in creating a consensual formula with the requirements of the times, and even ends with it to fall into repetition and rotation.

Philosophy was and still is the creative mental energy that stimulates more creativity, through its multiple and useful concepts.

If we refer to the dates of superior and prosperous nations, we would have seen that they have reached this goal through philosophy and science and the resulting visions, perceptions and behaviors.

It is true that the results of science are directly, through the technological product, but philosophy has more powerful and effective results, but it is only noticeable for a few people. The impressive consequences of material sciences in the modern era were not merely the outcome of the scientific statements and inventions as much as it is the result of the rule of rational philosophical thinking in all patterns of thinking and forms of awareness, that thinking that liberates minds from the authority of rigid concepts that exhausted their purposes, and is no longer beneficial to extrapolation and revelation Its potential. The liberation of the mind precedes the investment of the goods of nature and the exploitation of its resources, and this is only done by philosophy. And only with a kind of confusion and surprise takes place from some phenomena of life, human issues and existence, and thus it is based on the critical spirit that leads to review and reconsider what many people consider intuitive and does not require thinking or questioning.

Likewise, philosophical thinking is a complaint, so it is not recognized by the validity of something that is not presented to the queen of the mind in order to verify its sincerity and its non -contradiction.Therefore, it warns us of the speed of ratification or acceptance of what is not examined, tested and proven.We must leave room for doubt within our intellectual system in order not to harden our minds and move away from reality.

So philosophy was not a luxury or just a marginal intellectual work. In the interior of every benefit provided by modern achievements of man, philosophical components and hiddens did not deny, even at the level of rhetoric, art and theater.Also, philosophy is not just an arbitrary decision, nor just gossip and no theoretical, but rather a deep concern.

This is the task of philosophy and its importance at George Lucash and Jurgen Habermas, those who listened to their words except the few people, because their words are not desirable, because conscious criticism should reflect the status quo of any system, and thus can strip the poor coordination of contemporary civilization with its values, standards and morals.

The great principles presented by the twenty -first century show today distorted.This deformation in fact reflects the protest of nature against man and the ways of its exploitation of it and against the state of oppression and injustice, and it is the only expressive testimony that philosophers possess today.However, philosophy should not claim to have the absolute truth and the endless truth, the content of the truth should be measured by the basic ideas of its social and cultural origins that arose from it.

Philosophy always aims to be a means and not an end to itself that links the theory with practical practice.On the other hand, philosophy is trying to build a better reality, and this is what the authoritarian conscious when they sentenced Socrates to death, because a reality in that level cannot bear the current of this revolution inherent in the brain of philosophers.

The second topic: the tasks and contents of philosophy

Philosophy may not be a positive data if it cannot overcome its own roots, so that it has the ability to absorb its own topics and answer fateful questions.

Also, this can only be continuing with a critical sociology that puts things, life and reality is the subject of meditation and question.

Habermas believes that philosophy should not give up its rational approach to the account of another curriculum of humanities, but it must remain linked to the social problem so that philosophy is a radical criticism that acquires social, political and knowledge content.

With this critical methodology, philosophy is able to be contemporary to reality.

The real goal and function of philosophy is criticism of what is existing, and the same applies to the superficial grumbling of some people from what exists in order to change it.Because the primary goal of this type of criticism is to avoid people's loss of their ideas and methods of behavior that emerges from society in its current organizational form.

This statement leads us to that there is a great and dangerous task of philosophy and it is first for a person to learn to ask, but not about everything, and to adhere to from the beginning the basic rules, and that he does not simply expect to get everything always.

The fact is that there is a need to ask, and that there is always a wake up to more question.Here comes the role of philosophy or what is expected of it at the very least, especially with regard to important things such as death and life.There are also more profound and important questions such as the problem of awareness and knowledge that not only needs information theory, but also a methodology that philosophers use to address these precise questions.

Philosophy is a question of question as a critical problematic thought.Philosophical thinking makes everything the subject of question, discussion and debate.So Yasbers said: "The questions in philosophy are more important than the answers to them, and every answer in turn becomes a new question."

This is what made the nature of the question determined and related to the nature of the answer, and explains why the philosophical speeches are multiple. Likewise, the philosophical question at its core is nothing but a notification of the surprise of the question. As Aristotle sees that it is surprising that led people to philosophy. A person is the most amazing assets, because surprise requires a high degree of mind. However, there is a difference between scientific amazement and philosophical amazement, and as Schopenhauer sees that the amazement of the philosopher is astonishment in front of the usual matters that have a suit of intuition, and it is astonishment in front of things of the most general nature, making it the subject of the question, and turning it into problematic issues. As for the surprise of the world, it is astonishment in front of rare and selected partial matters, and it is seeking to link them to issues known to him previously, or in a more accurate expression that is to return the unknown to the information. As long as there are things that hurt a person, such as disease, death, misery, and misery. As long as the human existence and the existence of the world constitute a puzzle, the philosophical amazement will continue, and philosophy will continue. Everyone who deals with philosophy in which intellectual curiosity raises many questions that are in facts, philosophers have tried to answer.

Philosophy is a form of human consciousness, as it is concerned with the issues of society and the concerns of the times, and Marx says, “It is not the awareness of people who determines their existence. Rather, their social existence is the one that determines their awareness.” Philosophy differs from sociology and anthropology. Because it is not an objective scientific study of issues of a specific society; It is not just a diagnosis of some social diseases. The general and comprehensive nature of philosophy refuses to do so. It does not study what is being except in the context of what should be. The ambition of the philosopher to achieve the universality makes him lift from becoming a mere social reformer, or to be at the most social world imposed by a historical circumstance. What is the reason for the philosopher's interest in the issues of life and society? The answer is first because philosophy is a search for the truth, and the answers it suggests, it turns out that it is an inspection that is persistently behind the direct contribution to solving human problems, whatever the chances of success are weak. Secondly, because philosophy attaches the utmost importance to a person and considers it the center of its interests, as it does not care about issues except as much as it is related to the human being, so Fiuarbach said: “Every philosophy that establishes outside the human being and is isolated from it cannot be considered a philosophy.” Something starting with the same person, in all issues of life, and thus subject them to accountability.

And philosophy, as well, is a commitment because it is a merger and fusion in everything that would contribute to the process of life, and thus start it into a broader and broader space.From this standpoint, we understand why philosophy is recruited against all the forms of violence, in an attempt to spread the culture of tolerance and openness to others.

This explains the permanent philosopher need for more knowledge. Where Pythagoras refused to be called a wise because wisdom means possessing the truth, so he considered that the most appropriate and most sincere expression is that it is said that he is a philosopher (lover of wisdom), that is, just a person who yearns for knowledge and not its owner. From this standpoint, we can understand the behavior of Socrates in two ways: his feeling inferior to his knowledge made him go to the statesmen and poets, looking for the truth, but the second aspect of the image is evident in that Socrates went to them with a tribal suspicion to break that dukens belief in possessing the truth, and this is really what he reached Socrates, when he found that his inferiority was much superior to their knowledge.

The philosopher, a character that is not satisfied with improvised, superficial and naive answers. He is a person who refuses to believe that there are ready ideas and Muslim acquaintances. He is, as well, a man of a debate and criticism, a man of persuasion and conviction, the argument is fighting with the argument, knowing that he believes in the difference. Hence, it is against all forms of violence; Especially the intellectual terrorism practiced by every authoritarian, in addition to the categories of physical and psychological oppression. The philosopher is a person who is committed to the issues of his time, the concerns of society, and the permanent desire of man towards freedom and justice. The philosopher is a honest person with himself first, and honest with others second. And his sincerity is the one who makes him remove his thoughts towards cosmic, so he invites people to shares his ideas. The happiness of the optimal philosopher is manifested in reaching knowledge of itself, that is, he is constantly trying to get rid of the dogmatic dimension of knowledge.

Philosophy is betting on the time and history that affirm the credibility of its ideas.Philosophy is also betting in its development, on furnishing itself from within, through its constant posing to the question in order to fit the issues of society, and in an effort to preserve the humanity of man and defend his dignity.

And philosophy is also the continuous research that does not end and does not tire about the question about the secrets of existence that moved the awareness of the critical man who enlightened the mind and sharpening thought and pushing it for more question and criticism to reach the truth and solve gas existence and the secrets of life.

The essence of philosophical thought is freedom and liberation from any guardianship, as it was, that is, the exit of man from his mental palaces that he committed against himself and transcended this to understanding existence, interpretation and giving it morally meaning, in the sense of dismantling, interpretation, analysis and criticism of man's capabilities and capabilities.And if critical awareness is necessary to form philosophical thought, then philosophical thought is necessary to form a critical mind, which sharpens thought and develops its cognitive abilities and energies, and finds and strives to look at existence with causal thinking, not metaphysical.

Since Socrates, the philosophers put the world in a question, and the questions accumulated in their minds in order to search for a new, good, fair and useful certainty. This time is not in the abstract image, but rather with concepts and connotations and not with legendary stories, as well as by continuous research and investigation in the works of thought and the transformation of philosophical concepts and mental reflections into tools to understand reality, analyze and interpret it. It is natural for the philosophy itself to exhaust the love of wisdom and transcend questions, analysis and interpretation to know the contradictions and solve unparalleled contradictions and research in what is presented, and the installation of what is fragmented, and understanding the thorny and ambiguous relationship that links things and between them and nature. This means that a person has a free moral will to search, search, exhort, disassemble, and explain to answer the crucial questions that remain amazing, confused and without an answer. Philosophers do not stand idly by, but rather they remain steadfast, they treat amazement and disappointments and involve themselves in what is thorny and mysterious and look at the concepts and meanings that can change and develop, because every answer provokes another new question. The anxiety, amazement and confusion of thought is the origin of philosophical meditation.

Philosophers do not wonder about the first causes or the last of them, but rather they are trying to put arguments and choose non -conflict metaphysical concepts. Therefore, in the philosophy dictionary there is no saying "metaphysical struggle", but there are modest calls. They stand from the truth with their ideas and philosophical texts alone on the balcony, they do not trust any blind transcendent mind, but rather they talk about giving life and provoking death, but with a sense of firmness of the uncomfortable truth and trying to address it virtually and often reserved. This means that they do not ignore the ambiguities, but rather they are trying to put the "world" on the table and "explain it". Philosophy today has become more complicated, due to the continuous problems that made its fields more narrow, as philosophy is no longer looking at all things, as they were, but all things know, and at the same time you know nothing. Hence, the philosophers' dispute arises with natural scholars as well as with public opinion, which is seen by a legendary perspective about everything that is my problem in life. Philosophy was and still is the principles that facilitate the world. This is the focus of disagreement and a debate, especially about brain, fetuses and human engines, which cannot provide us with clear and sufficient arguments about this, despite the free accusations that some people make, such as the end of philosophy, the death of philosophy and others.

Philosophy does not know orders and does not file a lawsuit of salvation and knows only rational thought that reality brings while at the same time, attacking myths and delusions, and helps to set the priorities of the things that the person deals.The mind also exercises to reject surface or empty solutions of meaning and study and search to reach the deepest of what can be reached.

It also affects the will of a person and makes him live in the end according to what he thinks, believes and believes about life, values, freedom, existence, and God and the hereafter.For this reason, we find wrong philosophies usually lead to a wrong way.In return, we also find that there are people who have a good philosophy who live a wrong life or vice versa, but this is due to the fact that a person is always in harmony with his radical options and future aspirations.A person does not live in a rational and correct way unless he has a clear perception of the reality of life.

There is no doubt that philosophy has no direct practical applications, but this is normal.It affects all sciences without moving a finger, such as the architect who builds a building and supervises it in the smallest details without transferring one stone.

A person can also study philosophy, to clarify the aspects of ambiguity in his beliefs, and this leads him to think about basic issues, and he becomes able to study the opinions of ancient philosophers, in order to understand why they thought about the way they thought, and any trace that their thoughts can happen in his life.To complete all these dimensions, we will show the language of philosophy and ask it as positive data, not traditional construction.

The third topic: in the language of philosophy and the implications of its question.

The traditional philosophical language and its historical questions have changed completely, and this displacement was attached to a group of variables that included all the knowledge structure. For example, the operators and axes of Greek public philosophy based on a specific set of questions are considered philosophical traditions that have remained and frequently on The successive historical stages passed, and the area of ​​philosophical activity was under the tent of these questions, so what the Greeks thought remained continuous and constituted a fixed framework and borders until it became a fixed academic tradition, and a contemporary philosopher like Martin Heidegger considered that the topics of Western philosophy have not changed and that since its inception and over more than one thousand In general, he considered that philosophers are thinking of what is thinker in it and demanded philosophy to find a space that is not intellectually in philosophical activity, and this is an advertisement for a turn taking place at the level of the philosophical variable that keeps pace with the great variables and phenomena that accommodate the mechanisms of the current philosophical discourse, so it should be recognized that the traditional constants should be recognized For philosophical thought, it is subject to threats that are inevitable data on the ground and at the level of the idea, I created a new letter or a group of speeches that possess from perspectives and perceptions A lot and the start of these questions is a radical variable that leaves the traditional data of philosophy, and thus the limits of philosophy have become open to the spread of active staples. On the previous incitement, as it has become violated by the activities of other sciences and knowledge, and this has resulted from the fact that the questions of philosophy have found certainty answers of a sober scientific nature.

This means at the level of philosophy a huge breakthrough in its systems and axes, and this variable has motivated the group of innovations and natural and human scientific disciplines that formed a deep revolution in knowledge perceptions in all aspects of humanity.

The philosophical question that worries the Greeks regarding the eternity or occurrence of the universe is now finding attention from other branches of human knowledge such as physics, biology, geology, and Interpolboat.

This question has lost his previous identity and is working on it in other knowledge areas.This acknowledgment simply indicates that the questions and topics of philosophy were not absolute first, nor are they prepared to be subjected to the act of continuous knowledge displacement, that openness and tremendous progress in various branches of science permitted and allowed the exchange of roles, places and events.

Science has made tremendous progress at all levels, which allowed him to achieve other possessions that belonged to traditional knowledge, so if science begins with the question as well.

It is certain that it ends with the result to an end that is always different from philosophical practice.

Philosophy in recent times has been similar to science, as it seeks to strengthen the historical aspect of its activities, by that it intends to remove the element of abstraction from its entity, as it is keen to go to the hot historical issues that life raises in an effective and effective manner.

Despite this, this acknowledgment does not mean that philosophy has denied its previous tradition based on the question, and this is what constitutes the problematic aspect of the contemporary philosophical discourse, as knowledge in general is no longer satisfied with the narrative narrative element that is limited to the question only and the pure rhetorical presentation, these knowledge and science are in the forefront seeking to Establishing and strengthening the certain analytical element regarding the phenomena, these knowledge seeks to confirm their innovations and discoveries mathematically and in practice and practically, the physics that formed a cognitive branch confronted many questions of philosophical origin and was able during its activity to achieve the largest part of the answer to many of them, and this answer came In the form of certainty, it reaches the level of the absolute law, and with this result it will be completely unjustified if philosophy continues to return such questions, which remained for a long time, hesitate as one of its axes and topics.

In the subject of the philosophy of ethics, which was also considered an aspect of traditional philosophy questions, psychology and sociology began to strive to grant human behavior and social issues from morals and customs of deportation that approaches the normal sporting level.

Thus there were many breakthroughs that threatened and even undermined the philosophical question at the level of proposal and treatment as well.

But what remains of philosophy?

The philosophy of language is the most important feature that characterized the philosophy of the twentieth century, so that one of them described the philosophy of the twentieth century as the philosophy of language, because the philosophical discourse was circulating and contemplating its language, then he intentionally formed a philosophical prose language that is a paradoxical heritage of traditional philosophy, it was there The overlap between philosophy and pistomology in its generality and radically, and with a disgrace of historical motives, philosophy began to remove the flabby metaphysical appendages that represented a lot of philosophical concern and its interests, and thus the metaphysical space that was surrounding philosophy was presented to stinging criticism and this in turn the depth of the critical trend in contemporary philosophy through This trend was affected by events sometimes and their impact on historical political and cultural events.

On the other hand, philosophy was unable to continue in isolation from the tremendous influence that science produced on all the levels of life, so that the philosophy of science had emerged, as it wanted to take a transcendent step on the scientific achievement, in order to put it a task and add the scientific achievement in its own cosmic betrayal, consideringThis achievement is only in its partial creativity, but its mission is to give the cosmic and philosophical significance of this achievement.Generally, the language and questions of philosophy have changed, and this is ultimately considered a great and deep knowledge displacement.

The fourth topic: philosophy and the logic of reality.

Philosophy is still linked in the minds of most people, to those abstract subjects and invisible entities, so everyone is satisfied with condoning and rejecting philosophy.

Regardless of the fact that the rejection of philosophy is in itself a philosophical position, as it is in addition to that based on an incorrect knowledge of philosophy.Or more strictly based on a minor understanding of the mission of philosophy.Because it is a look that mixes the history of philosophy and philosophy itself.That is, between the history of philosophical ideas and philosophy as a mental activity and a very interesting mental state, and a distinct awareness of what is an entire being with the diligent pursuit of what should be.

If our idea of philosophy is that it is the one that studies abstract gelatinous subjects and creates fairy entities, that is, it is neither scientific and nor feasible from its study and this is true, if philosophy is like this one day, but it was not so, it is even if it does not care about the details, but it is notThese details are eliminated or sacrificed with fragmented facts, at the expense of a comprehensive view.On the contrary, it derives from a comprehensive or total view of its formulations, to establish fragmented facts in a healthy and correct format or format.

Look at philosophy, as a history of philosophical ideas is a short view.The study of ancient philosophical ideas, although it is useful in defining the term and deepening studies, but it is not a philosophical subject or philosophy.It is a historical study in the professional sense of the word, which does not fail to the topics of history.

As for philosophy in its correct sense, it is a mental activity, vision, mental effectiveness, and logical, conscious and subjective techniques.It is not a subject of subjects, but rather the mental state in which we see the facts, by setting and organizing our knowledge in formats and systems that are at the same time the standard and motivation.It is the criterion for the rooting of the achievement and the incentive to overcome this achievement, in view of the prospects of knowledge.That is, seeking to be the beginning of what is being.

Philosophy is more capable of other systems of knowledge to form this global and human awareness and the affirmation of human unity on our small planet or our small village, and those who carry on their shoulders the trust of philosophy can shed light on Muslim women, assumptions, values and lifestyles.Perhaps they were also able in the methods of their analysis and criticism to recover the owners of power, political, social, scientific and religious institutions, from their irrational and inhumane tendencies, and bring them closer to the prospects of universal global and human awareness.

Finally, they can benefit from their specializations specified in the philosophy of values, ethics, metaphors, history of philosophy, theory of knowledge, philosophical anthropology and future thinking, in examining, analyzing and criticizing many of the diseases of the times that almost became chronic diseases: such as killing, absence of awareness of drugs, slogans, delicacy of pleasures, racial, national and national extremismReligious, the spread of feelings of despair and frustration.

Rather, the philosopher will not be able to lose sight of the role of science and technology in creating global awareness from a mental point of view and unifying the methods of life and behavior models for increasing numbers of people. Regardless of the devastating effects of technology, the fatal damage resulting from complacency in caring for the ethics of science and not linking its results to human values. It has been proven that philosophy that does not abound in the course of the major transformations of its era, which ignores the scientific movement and does not interact with it, eliminating it with gradual stagnation, and thus fading. This is an idea that can be considered as a Muslim who does not make the history of philosophy to confirm, and in light we will adopt the following definition of philosophy: “Philosophy is the wisdom of knowledge of knowledge”; Any wisdom that is inspired by the sciences and knowledge of its time and relies on it.

The mission of philosophy is to be part of the world.You look at him with open, vigilant eyes, and understanding minds, understanding and guidance concerned with facts, and do not fly in free, difficult spaces, as its mission has become more humble and focused on studying the mind and how he knows what he knows and his cognitive tools.Therefore, philosophy of our time is a philosophy of science in the term, approach and subject.Any part of the human being and his world in his successes and failures.

The truly exciting thing is that contemporary science with all its amazing developments was unable to achieve what it achieved, without using philosophy, whether in its deep, comprehensive view or its basic formulations or its logical formulas.

All sciences were pushed, seeking help from philosophy, such as physics, astronomy, and biology.Rather, mathematics did not find an escape from resorting to it, whether in the logical assets of mathematics or in some other theories.

This intimidation or resorting to philosophy was not motivated by emotion.Rather, it was in response to difficult necessities and problems, which these sciences encountered during their developments. It was the scientific necessity that led scholars towards philosophy.Where they finally realized that there is no way to achieve progress in science, except by resorting to philosophy and armament with its wisdom.A audible look, to what has been accomplished in the areas of science, gives us a clear idea of what philosophy is doing for the future of man, I mean philosophy as a highly attention and depth mental state that provides science with extremely important and accurate tools and methodology.

Therefore, any goal in our lives abandons philosophy.In fact, it abandons its content and essence, as well as it provides science as a goods and not as interconnected achievements and consistent construction.It has accurate objective and methodological requirements.It took many stages in which it made effort, suffering and failures.To achieve success.It is what we see its production in what we see today, from innovations in various fields of devices and technologies such as digital devices, space invasion by visual broadcasting, missiles, information flow, cloning, and others.

A person today controls the temperature of his bedroom and uses a digital device to see the entire world and can move from country to country and know what is happening in it through a small device and he sips tea and rises in the morning through a music alarm, and he washed with water that controls its temperature, and goes to his work whereComputers and calculators are connected to those who want any spot in the world via mobile or internet, and other use of the world's devices in the rest of its day.

How does this person who uses these techniques come to coexist with them in a normal and familiar way?That is, how does science understand?How does he deal with his achievements and give them their true dimensions?

Philosophy alone is the one who has answers to all these questions, and this will be clear to us more when we carefully investigate the reasons for the renaissance of the West.

Beyond that renaissance, impressive superiority, great achievements, critical culture, philosophical thought, and an open society that guarantees an atmosphere of scientific research, and believes that the universe is subject to laws and Sunnahs and these Sunnahs are available to those who discover and ridicule them.Science is to absorb the truth of the law and adapt it to harnessing at all levels.

Western science has proven that its impressive superiority has no genetic biological ethnic basis, but the secret of this impressive superiority is due to purely cultural reasons, as the nations are similar in innate capabilities.We do not deny that Western life is full of flaws and shortcomings in social, psychological, spiritual and religious life.But it is hardly hidden from one of the crucial role played by philosophy in the renaissance and development of Western civilization..

Philosophy is a developing and unique cognitive system, and it is very desirable that half of philosophy is that it is the science of using reason because philosophy is not a sect, no bee or a religion, but rather a way to regulate the activity of the human mind in all areas that the mind can reach.

There is no doubt that a human being saturated with the technical style can be skilled in the use of mechanisms of technical scientific thinking, but it will inevitably be unable to overcome the limits drawn by these mechanisms, that is, it will be unable to create new horizons for knowledge and action, and to create new possibilities for our existence and freedom.

Based on this, philosophy will have to subject the prevailing technical sciences to a critical analysis; This analysis should address science as a force that directs a daily human life in various fields. These technical sciences must be pursued in all its apparent and hidden forms in our current world. This does not mean questioning the reality of scientific theories, but rather a statement that the scientific truth is not the last truth, and that science is not the last word in human life. Also, this critical follow -up will not aim to search for an original fact of things, or about a missing paradise that must be restored, but only to the realization of technical sciences within its limits, and alert to the risks that result from the transformation of these sciences to an end in itself, rather than being just a means.

And philosophy, when it takes a critical position towards science, is only practicing its original mission. Philosophy does not accept any assumptions or prosecutions, but rather is subject to criticism and question. When a person takes the philosophical position, the world is exposed in a new light, as the axioms lose their preliminary, and established convictions need to be found, and the familiar things appear to be strange. In order for philosophy to be faithful to its original meaning, this position must be taken regarding the prevailing scientific-technical orientation in today's world, that is, it must break this familiarity that has become bound by it and makes it look and as if it was intuitive, it must make it appear in its strangeness.

However, philosophy, in order to be able to do this task, must, the same, to be freed from this scientific-technical trend that its influence began to extend to it as well. Thus, it is no longer strange to hear inside philosophy voices that cross, in one way or another, about this trend. There are those who call, for example, that philosophy must be limited to tracking various areas of scientific knowledge and distributing themselves, such as science, to partial and accurate specializations. Even more than this, there are those who see that philosophy must abandon its traditional mission in directing moral practical life, on the pretext that philosophy, in order to preserve its "scientific", must leave this task for ideologies and visions of the world. It is surprising that this perception spreads at this particular time, as human control over nature and the human being takes frightening dimensions that urge the task of thinking about the issues of individual and collective moral approach.

Is it not time for a philosopher to fly in the highest and go to the extent that seems beautiful without captivating himself in a reference format, is not a handful of joyful possibilities better for him than a vehicle filled with sneaked certainty?

Whatever it is, it is not possible to ignore the stage that a person made from the forest to the moon.

To this extent, we can imagine aspects of symmetry and the points of intersection between religion, philosophy and science, even if they have a different path. Religion gives final answers, philosophy opens the file of questions, and science tries in detailed information to formulate crystallized ideas. As if the three represent a tree whose roots are religion, its trunk of philosophy and its fruits. In fact, there are points of intersection between the three fields philosophy, science and faith. In fact, philosophy is that region that has no name between science and religion exposed to attack on both sides. Religion differs from philosophy in that it gives a specific, certain, certain answer, while philosophy remains looking and provoking the storms of suspicion without stopping. And in all the best and each of them a person needs. And in the human position on death, we see the science that does not have the answer. As for philosophy, it swims in infinite spaces in search of interpretation and logical. But religion enters the heart of man with certainty, comfort and conviction in the sense of life twice in this world and the hereafter. But had it not been for the philosophical thoughts, thought would not have been active in history; Philosophy represents the trunk of a tree from which the fruits of science come out. Hence, the relationship of religion with science and philosophy must be understood that each of them has its own field. For this reason, historians of science and senior thinkers assert that the culture of the West, its sciences, arts, organizations and civilization is the product of philosophical thought. French thinker Dubrie says: The texts of the fifth century BC still ask us and no philosopher in our days claims that he is thinking better than Plato and Heidegger says: The mighty of the mind. He also confirms that the Greeks have: “.. they invented the major formulas of philosophical thought, and it is not left for the whole generations to create something fundamental that could be added to it. As for the German philosopher Schopenhauer, it describes them as the Republic of Geniuses, because what they accomplished in the field of thought, science, art, politics and social experience was a pure innovation that they did not draw from anyone and did not imitate a people in it, but was the foundation of the activity of the human mind.

Conclusion:

At the conclusion of this research, we reach the statement of the results that we have reached and can be summed up with the following:

1- The philosopher is a member of a group affected by the events of his society and affects it, which is in his deep view of matters and its continuous analysis of the first principles and the distant ills of the various phenomena of society- becomes more absorbing the events of society than other ordinary individuals.Hence, the philosophical effort has become more related to researching human and society problems for researching the problems of the universe.

2- The general behavior of individuals in any society is not random, but rather is based on intellectual foundations that it organizes, and it differs from one society to another according to its own circumstances, and it represents the theoretical building of this society, through which it is possible to understand the behavior and daily practices of individuals and extract this theoretical aspect and those intellectual foundations of practical life inSociety is at the heart of the work of philosophers and thought men.

3- Philosophy always aims to be a means and not an end to itself that links the theory with practical practice, and here lies its importance. On the other hand, philosophy tries to build a better reality.

4- Philosophy may not be a positive data if it cannot overcome its own roots, so that it has the ability to absorb its own topics and answer fateful questions.Also, this can only be continuing with a critical sociology that puts things, life and reality is the subject of meditation and question.

5- The contemporary science with all its amazing developments was unable to achieve what it achieved, without using philosophy, whether in its deep, comprehensive, or in its basic formulations or in its logical formula.