Fathi Triki: About the new Agura mazes
After it was presented as a Utopia, technology has become - according to the services it provides to humanity - the subject of a question since it faces critical thought and looks at its psychological, value and environmental consequences.Questions are still far from the priorities of the Arab intellectual preoccupation, and the orbit of a lecture entitled "The Crisis of attendance and the philosophy of reasonSina and "The Arab Philosophical Complex".
"The presence in the world is through positive interaction with the data of the times at different levels; economics, meeting, culture and thought.We mean positive interaction contributing to progress and development through creativity in the scientific, technological and artistic fields.It seems to me that the principles of our civilizational progress now do not lie mainly in its technical dimension, as much as they are placed within renewable perceptions that must be resumed in the formation of a balanced society in which the rationalization of mind and behavior coincides with the rationalization of lifestyle in society, so that the Arab individual does not live deeply between the luxury of technology and dullnessMind and naivety of understanding..
Triki notes that the history of the intellectual development that is supposed to keep pace with technical development is known as bumps in the Arab context;Where "the discussions were ranked and the collisions abounded and the mental principles and critical culture were unable to penetrate into the social fabric," as he put it..From here he concludes to the subject of his lecture;Where he says: "There are many aspects of the crisis of our presence in the world that cannot be limited to one lecture.I will limit ourselves to an important element that I consider to be important to be the new Agoura resulting from the digital revolution.I will start analyzing the data of these Agoura to talk about the culture crisis and the necessity of criticism and the appointment of the requirement of reasoning..
"There is no doubt that the most important revolution in the last century is the digital media revolution, the artificial intelligence revolution, and the technology of communication that was prepared, along with other means, enforcement to culture, and ideas by radio and TV, then computer and its programmers, then by the Internet and everythingMedia technologies can be generally available.These new technologies in the current digital revolution change in a significant way, the patterns of knowledge and production of knowledge.Therefore, we can now spread thought and all components of culture quickly with a wide audience without the need to visit libraries and move from one country to another, and above that tomorrow it is possible to weave cultural relations between individuals who cannot meet, and to establish effective cooperation between human minds and work away from a distance.It is also possible by these advanced technologies to mobilize individuals and peoples, directing them towards certain goals and influencing convictions and beliefs..
He adds: "The media revolution has made an impressive development of the path of the mind, in a way that people became the highest capacity to accept the most abstract ideas and represented by the easiest..However, we do not deny that the use of this technological revolution in political and social purposes may also lead to the misery and perishing of humans, and to the extinction of the mind and the abandonment of conscience.Therefore, this revolution has opened a sharp crisis in the pattern of using the mind, and perhaps our presence in this world and our residence in the present vessels and all their followers compels us to research and excavate the possibility of establishing moral rules and human rights laws to live together..
Crust all of this is the formation of "a new Agoura that has been organized and made the ideas easy to marry and understand through elaborate means, but they return every thinking to a form of advertising culture by crystallizing what is the idea of proximity to the citizen", according to the Triki expression.
The rules of the new Agora game "may put the citizen in the position of inability to think, choose and make decisions.In addition, the new sophists, and we mean "experts" and the people of politics and ideology in general, can interfere in these new "Agoura", and they claim specialization in all kinds of thought and practices, they direct the rulings, make opinions, and they curse decisions, and thus spoil all real communication.As the author of the book "The Serek Philosophy" says.
To organize these Agoura, Triki sees the necessity of providing founding thought on the demand for reasoning with what is a basic form of ethics of living together, as a set of principles that lead the human act within any context, which is a form of attendance that the Triki explains by saying: "I mean the ability of man toResidence in the present time, confirming his actions and contributing to lifestyles..He continues: "Nevertheless, the characteristic of this ability is the human evaluation in order to distinguish it from others, and to put it in a common presence through relationships of approach with the other and with others.This ability should be a human being in principle, also to be a new media feature..
The Tunisian thinker explains what he calls the "crisis of attendance", which is manifested through several forms: the first of which is "the isolation of the contemporary man, which as much as he is present within the social formations that make up his world, finds himself in the face of a disturbing unit.As a person denies the new technologies for communication himself from the human presence as he turns television channels, crouches in front of his computer, or reads his newspaper.It closes within a fold of unit, which is the dominant cybersecurity more and more..
The attendance crisis also arises, according to Triki, "according to a form of the absence of the material world.Because the default can put the individual in a situation during which he does not feel things as they are in reality.Things and individuals, the stagnation of the ocean, and the waiting waiting for all of the disasters, decorate the whole world today.In his book "Against Fear ', Dominic Lucur has assigned an important role to the current philosophy represented in the struggle against fear to break this new political situation and bring humanity out of this crisis".
As for the third form of the attendance crisis, it is "by calling a person to stay in monitoring.The disturbing escalating control and punishment, through combing the cameras, and for media monitoring and satellite resources, and now by genetic manipulation and pollination depending on the change of DNA, makes the person capable of controlling his structure and life easily, and puts it in any case in a position of confusion, so it is difficult for him to choose and practiceHis life is freedom..
The author of the book "The Philosophy of Daily Life" notes that it is worth noting that "the new Agoura has made the thought easy to obtain with elaborate and complex means", but he adds in return: "The crisis of thinking occurs when the word stops to be exacerbated by the truth, and becomes twisted and complex technique for powerDeficient.When the Settatia in the ancient Greek era was dominated by "Agora", it developed the falsehood at the expense of the truth, so he worked the speech unlike knowledge.And when Plato was talking about the violence of the discourse, he did not mean anything other than this acquisition of power, which was achieved by rhetoric and ignorance of true knowledge.Of course, the sophist and the philosopher, thanks to the democratic practice, shares the public space itself, that is, "Agoura", which allows the navy of expression.However, they are in a complete relationship with knowledge and with the truth.The first, the sophist, wanted to win the audience and reside in his idea if necessary, by making a (Duxa) thinking proportional to what he wanted to reach from a goal, while the second, the philosopher, searches for the truth of the truth, according to the phrase Michel Foucault, that is, building an intellectual and moral speechOn mental basis..
When going to "New Agoura", it is related to a rapid transition to the information by the word and the image that "is supposed to be an editor of the space of opinion, but it becomes very difficult for the exam.In this case, we can say that the crisis of thought reaches its maximum: the citizen no longer expresses his views, but rather consumes a product made through the media..He did not think, but we think about him and instead of him.And we present to him on the occasion of any expert event that gives him certain explanations and directed a specific direction according to controlled goals, recalling the old dualism: the world of the scientist (which is now within the digital space, the expert and the media) and the ignorant that we should make an opinion for him..
The author of the book "Identity and its Bettings" asks: "In this situation, how can ethics be developed for media thought?".He says: "Aristotian wisdom," Al -Fronizis ", is the practical wisdom, which allows the avoiding exaggeration and extremism during the treatment of information and knowledge.In some of my work, I called this wisdom to be a rationalization in the footsteps of Al -Farabi, Kant and Rolls.Even out, I can say simply that we consider the mind - in general - the principle of all my view.We consider the privilege tool for every practical thinking about human life.It is a reasonable person who makes the mind a reference in a way in which its morals are identical to rationality..
He adds: "It is the philosophy of reasoning for Al -Farabi that gives the mind its social dimension as long as it can be the source of the fabric of relations with others, since the mind is a standard for every humanity.Justice, then, is the sum of theoretical criteria and practical preparations that allow the obstacle person to emphasize the ability to match the mind with his daily life, so he lives according to the requirements of the mind and is able to preserve his life..
Returning to the context of his lecture, Fathi Al -Triki says: "The media revolution and the technologies of communication need a moral basis in order to direct it as a humanitarian direction, and resorting to practical philosophy in relation to this revolution becomes a priority.".The Tunisian thinker, here, cite the German philosopher Kant, when he said at the end of his life: "We dream only of lights, and we believe that the world becomes clear enough by the light of the mind in a way that obscures the enthusiasm forever.But here is the night and all its ghosts come back to us...".The Triki comments: "There is no doubt that Kant has allocated criticism to resist these delusions and this abuse.Why do we not regain the Kantian question regarding this media revolution: (What is the path that the mind must follow?), It may be the path of criticism and reasoning, this path that leads to the end of the other and to live together in the confines of respect for the true saying..
آداب وفنونالتحديثات الحية
